Home arrow Blog arrow tagsarrow Engineering

The Hullart.com Blog

Tag >> Engineering

" Extant Egyptian records, whether written or pictorial, throw no light on the methods employed by the builders of the pyramids either in planning or in constructing their monumental works."

So says I.E.S. Edwards in his famous book The Pyramids or Egypt. Logically this makes no sense. But whatever information they used to construct the pyramids on the Giza Plateau must also have been quickly lost as the preceding contructions reveal a lack of the same sophistication of construction methods.

It also makes no sense that within the great pyramid and others there is no writing or pictorial illustration. If we are to believe that the purpose of the pyramid was as a tomb then why did they not follow the same procss as was later followed in the Valley of the Kings. There the tombs were fully decorated? This lack of records or other ornamentation in regards to purpose and the methods of contruction may provide a clue rather than a mystery. What can we suggest if we look on this lack of information as a clue.

1. The information used to construct the Giza complex came from somewhere and was lost quickly.

2. Wherever the information came from it is not apparent from other sites of antiquity that have been excavated.

3. No burial has been found in any of the Giza Pyramids or, I believe in any of the others.

4. No technology has been uncovered that would suggest methods that would allow the construction of these objects on such a grand scale. Some ideas have been suggested but none is productive enough to have been the method used. 

5. Such knowledge/ information would seem to be a treasure of any civilization and would most likely be protected and passed down to succeeding generations.

6. There is no mention from succeeding generations that they recieved any information on how to build the pyramids.

7. Pyramids that followed the construciton of the Giza Plateau seem to be trial and error projects to reverse engineer the Giza constructions.

8. If the number of people suggested particiatied in the construction of the Giza Complex it would seem likely that one of more would have in some way recorded some information in regards to the construction.

9. The constructions seem to have come out of nowhere. There is no construction information available that records the earlier pyramid building leading up to the Pyramids at Giza.

10. The Giza Constructions are like seeing a balance sheet of a small company that during a particular quarter grows immeasurably and then shrinks back to its original state by the next quarter with no explanation. How could life have proceeded normally in the face of such an achievement?

11. To the lack of information is the clue. It tells us that something extraordinary happened that for some reason came from nowhere, was not recoreded and was never successfully replicated.

 

This mystery is a part of my directon in exploring the ruins of past and future.  I paint these ruins, as a part of the new Burning Forest Series based on the essense of what I feel versus what I know.  As I saw them for the first time a year and a half ago they are, and will remain, one of the most fascinating challenges both artistically and  intellectually.                   

 


The Pyramids and Perfection

Posted by: Jim in PyramidsMysteryEngineeringEgypt on

The Great Pyramids Watercolor Painting   As reported by Petrie, in his classic book from the 1800's on the Pyramids,  the equisite detail and painstaking pursuit of perfection make these constructions both inspiring and enigmatic. A quote from the book.

" Hence the mean thickness of the joints there is '020'; therefore the mean variation of the cuttting of the stone from a straight line and from a true square, is but '01 on lenght of 75 inches up the face, an amount of accuracy equal to most modern opticians' straight edges of such a lenth."

It is inspiring because it shows what can be achieved with care and attention to detail. It is enigmatic when one wonders why it was considered necessary to dress the stones to this degree of accurracy and how it was done on a such a large scale over a prolonged period of time. Working with businesses today, as a consultant, I can report that to have employees apply themselves consistently over a period as short as one day is an issue. So as we go deeper into the mystery of these monuments we find even more unanswsered questions.     


A question that has always haunted me is why the builders used such large blocks in the construction? Logic would tell us that if at their size and weight(minimum 2.5 tons) it was difficult for them to handle they would have reduced their size to facilitate construction. The only conclusion that I can make is that they must not have had trouble working with such large masses or else the construction plan itself required the larger size. Why not make them the size of standard building blocks?

If anyone can shed light on this conundrum please let me know!

 


Pyramid Math -- Part 1

Posted by: Jim in PyramidsMysteryEngineeringEgypt on

Not too long ago a program on Nova spotlighted a successful attempt to reconstruct a modern day pyramid near the great pyramids on the Giza Plateau. Over a several week(3) period, using the same methods they thought were used in the construcion of the Giza Pyramids, they were successful in building a pyramid of 186 stones(same size as the  smallest in the Great Pyramid)that was 20 feet high. I decided to compare the performance on this new pyramid with the Great Pyramid to see how long using the methods of the new pyramid builders it would take them to construct the great pyramid. Here is what I found out.

Assumptions

New Pyramid Construction(actual)
44 workmen
186 stones
3 weeks

Great Pyramid
2.4 million stones

Problem

Solve the equation for identifying the number of workmen
and time required to build the great pyramid at the same performance
rate as the new pyramid.

Performance Solution Equation - Time
186/3 = 2.4M/X
X = 38,710 weeks or 744 years

What this says is that at the same performance rate of 3 weeks to dress and lay 186 blocks how many years would it take to build a pyramid with 2.4 milllion. (Note: This does not take intoconsideration the additional complexifying aspects of scaled logistics and coordination or size.) It also suggests that that at
the same productivity ratio that it would have taken 567,742 workmen to achieve the same result on the larger pyramid over 744 years.

While these are straight line projections, and are simplfied, they do point to a potential missing element in the puzzle faced with the problem of discovering the design, processes, tools and manpower used in the construction of the Giza Pyramids.

Except for the simplified approach, if I have made any mistake in the
math let me know.


Pyramid Math -- Part 2

Posted by: Jim in PyramidsMysteryEngineeringEgypt on

How many blocks per hour would the builders of the Great Pyramid have had to lay if it was built in 20 years?

Assumptions

20 years
365 days a year
no days off
2.4M blocks

1. 8 hour work day = 41 per hour
2. 10 hour work day = 32.9 per hour
3. 12 hour work day = 27.4 per hour

If this is true then we need to know what strategies they utilized to be this productive! This is the BIG STORY because if they were this productive then we have lost all touch with the concept of personal and work group productivity. (Note: Remember the smallest block is estimated to weigh 2.5 tons.)

Please let me know if the math is wrong!

<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>








About the Prints
  • All Prints are signed and numbered by the artist and are a limited series of 1000
  • Prints are 20" x 24" or 24" by 20"
  • Printed on Archival Quality watercolor paper with Archival Quality inks.
  • For custom print sizes or large runs, please contact the gallery
For more information on our printing process, please read this case study from HP (pdf)

Shipping
  • Shipping is FREE to the Continental United States
  • For shipping outside the United States, please contact the gallery
  • Please allow for a 21 day lead time on all prints. If you need expedited service, please contact the gallery






Subscribe to Our Newsletter
Mail Format:


© 2012 J. Hull Gallery Watercolor Paintings
Privacy Policy  |  Site Map
site by Christopher Green Design
The J. Hull Gallery web site features watercolor paintings from watercolor painter Jim Hull. Jim Hull's watercolor paintings feature a variety of topics including golf course watercolor paintings, landscape watercolor paintings, city watercolor paintings, town watercolor paintings, village watercolor paintngs, space watercolor paintings, outer space watercolor paintings, ocean watercolor paintings, and boat watercolor paintings. The watercolor painting gallery sells original watercolor art as well as reproduction prints of original watercolor paintings. A lower cost art option is to buy our poster prints of watercolor paintings. While you are here, please visit out watercolor painting blog featuring painting tips, watercolor advice, insight into the ancient world, philosophy and information on independent space development. The gallery also features several series of watercolor paintings featuring Egypt watercolor paintings, watercolor paintings of the pyramids and karnack, watercolor paintings of Italy and watercolor paintings of Florence and watercolor paintings of Venice.